The Abia State House of Assembly has dismissed reports claiming it has failed to pass a bill for the establishment of state police. This clarification follows recent assertions by the Nigerian Senate, which identified Abia as one of the states that have yet to transmit their resolutions regarding the matter to the upper chamber.
The disagreement emerged after the Senate listed Abia among states yet to transmit their resolutions on the constitutional amendment required to decentralise law enforcement. While the Senate’s records suggest a lack of communication from the state, the Abia legislature maintains that the necessary legislative steps have been completed.
This administrative discrepancy complicates the ongoing national debate over policing reforms. For the Abia State government, the establishment of a state police force is a central component of its strategy to address local security challenges and reduce reliance on the federal police structure.
Legislative process and security autonomy
The dispute centres on the transmission of documents between the state legislature and the federal Senate. In the process of amending the 1999 Constitution to allow for state-level policing, state assemblies are expected to communicate their resolutions to the National Assembly to signal their support or specific conditions for the change.
The Abia House of Assembly’s position is that the bill has been passed, effectively countering the Senate’s list of non-compliant states. The impasse suggests a potential breakdown in communication or a procedural delay in the formal receipt of the state’s documents by the Senate leadership.
Governor Alex Otti has been a vocal proponent of decentralised policing, arguing that local law enforcement is better positioned to understand and respond to the unique security needs of the state. The push for state police is a broader movement across Nigeria, led by various governors who argue that the current centralised model is insufficient to combat kidnapping, banditry, and other forms of violent crime.
The constitutional amendment process requires a high threshold of consensus among state legislatures and the National Assembly. If states like Abia are perceived as being slow to act, it can stall the momentum required to pass fundamental changes to the country’s security architecture. Conversely, if states have indeed passed these bills but the Senate has not recorded them, it creates a bottleneck that delays the implementation of reformist policies.
The next step involves a reconciliation of records between the Abia State House of Assembly and the Nigerian Senate. The state government will need to ensure that the passed resolution is formally acknowledged by the Senate to clear Abia’s name from the list of states yet to comply with the legislative requirements for state policing.
Explore more News stories from Business Elites Africa.
