Joseph Oloyede, the deposed Apetumodu of Ipetumodu in Osun State, has filed a lawsuit to challenge the appointment of his successor to the traditional stool.
The former monarch is seeking to overturn the decision made by the state authorities and the traditional council regarding the leadership of the Ipetumodu kingdom. His legal action comes shortly after his removal from the throne, a move necessitated by his criminal history abroad.
Oloyede was removed from his position following a conviction by a United States court involving a $4.2 million COVID-19 relief fund fraud. The conviction rendered his continued reign as a traditional ruler untenable under the regulatory frameworks governing chieftaincy titles in Osun State.
Background on the US fraud conviction
The legal proceedings against Oloyede in the United States centered on the fraudulent acquisition of pandemic-related relief funds. The US court found that he was involved in a scheme to siphon approximately $4.2 million intended for COVID-19 relief efforts. The scale of the fraud and the subsequent conviction provided the legal basis for the Osun State government to initiate his dethronement.
In Nigeria, traditional rulers are expected to maintain high moral standing and adhere to the laws of the land. Criminal convictions, particularly those involving significant financial fraud, often trigger review processes by the State Ministry of Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs. Under these processes, a monarch can be deposed if their conduct is deemed to bring the institution of traditional leadership into disrepute.
The Ipetumodu community has faced significant administrative uncertainty since the vacancy on the throne was created. The appointment of a new monarch is intended to restore stability to the kingdom, but Oloyede’s lawsuit now introduces a period of legal volatility that could delay the installation of a permanent successor.
Legal experts suggest that the outcome of this suit will depend on whether Oloyede can prove that the procedures used to select his successor violated the Ipetumodu chieftaincy declaration or the Osun State Chieftaincy Law. While his criminal conviction remains a matter of record, his challenge focuses on the administrative legality of the replacement process rather than his original conviction.
The state government and the traditional council have yet to issue a formal response to the specific claims made in the lawsuit. The matter is currently pending before the court, with the next hearing date expected to determine the validity of the new appointment.
Explore more News stories from Business Elites Africa.
