Economic experts are calling for the implementation of mandatory credit allocation policies that would compel Nigerian commercial banks to direct a higher proportion of their loan books toward productive sectors.
The recommendation suggests that focusing credit on agriculture, manufacturing, and construction is essential to accelerate job creation and ensure that the benefits of current economic reforms are felt by the broader population.
The proposal comes at a critical time as Nigeria continues to navigate significant macroeconomic adjustments, including the unification of the foreign exchange market and the removal of fuel subsidies. Analysts argue that without a deliberate shift in how financial institutions deploy capital, the real sector may struggle to provide the growth necessary to offset rising living costs.
Currently, many Nigerian banks show a preference for low-risk assets, such as government securities and treasury bills, rather than lending to the manufacturing or agricultural sectors. This trend, often referred to as the crowding-out effect, limits the availability of long-term, affordable credit for businesses that drive industrialisation and food security.
While lending to the government offers high, predictable yields for banks, it does little to expand the nation’s productive capacity. Experts argue that a regulatory framework forcing a specific percentage of credit towards the real sector could bridge this gap, provided that the risks are managed effectively through proper oversight by the Central Bank of Nigeria.
Challenges to Real Sector Credit Expansion
The reluctance of financial institutions to fund productive sectors is not without cause. High inflation rates, currency volatility, and significant infrastructure deficits in Nigeria increase the risk profile of loans to manufacturers and farmers. For many banks, the cost of managing these risks often outweighs the potential interest income from such loans.
In the manufacturing sector, for instance, the high cost of energy and the difficulty in repatriating funds or accessing foreign exchange for raw materials make long-term lending unattractive. Similarly, the agricultural sector faces seasonal risks and a lack of robust insurance mechanisms, which further complicates credit assessment for commercial lenders.
However, proponents of mandatory lending argue that the systemic risk of a stagnant real sector is far greater than the individual credit risks faced by banks. A thriving manufacturing and agricultural base would lead to increased tax revenues for the government, improved foreign exchange earnings through exports, and a reduction in the unemployment rate.
Data from the National Bureau of Statistics consistently shows that the services sector often dominates Nigeria’s GDP, while the manufacturing sector’s contribution has faced volatility. Strengthening the productive sectors is viewed as a prerequisite for true economic diversification and a departure from the country’s heavy reliance on oil revenues.
If the government moves to compel lending, it will likely need to pair the mandate with de-risking strategies. This could include enhanced credit guarantee schemes, improved agricultural insurance products, and more stable energy policies to lower the operational costs for businesses in these sectors.
The debate also touches on the tension between maintaining bank stability and achieving social-economic objectives. Regulators must ensure that any mandate to lend to higher-risk sectors does not compromise the capital adequacy ratios or the overall liquidity of the banking system, particularly as the Central Bank of Nigeria continues to tighten monetary policy to combat inflation.
The next step for this proposal lies in the hands of policymakers and the federal government, who must decide whether to move from advisory recommendations to formal regulatory requirements. Whether such a move will attract more capital to the real sector or simply increase the non-performing loan ratios of commercial banks remains a central point of contention among economists.
Explore more Money stories and analysis from Business Elites Africa.
