Your Business Is Profitable. But Is It Ready to Sell? 

Business owners preparing to sell often focus on revenue and profit. Buyers look far beyond that, A business can be profitable and still fail to close a sale if its records, contracts and compliance history aren’t in order. Many founders reach the sale process without the documentation or governance structures buyers expect, and that gap often shows up only after negotiations have already started.

For SME owners across Africa considering an eventual sale or acquisition, the lessons below translate directly, since buyers everywhere apply the same basic scrutiny before they commit capital.

Prepare Before Buyers Get Involved

A business owner preparing for a sale is often navigating a transaction of this size and complexity for the first time. That inexperience can leave founders underestimating how closely buyers will examine their records, contracts and compliance history once due diligence begins.

The goal of preparing early is to identify and resolve issues before a buyer discovers them. A business that appears organised and transparent during due diligence moves through the process faster, and on more favourable terms, than one that scrambles to produce documents on request.

What Buyers Look For

Buyers start with corporate records. Formation documents, operating agreements, shareholder agreements, capitalisation tables and board records should be complete, accurate and easy to produce on request.

Incomplete company records are among the most common issues buyers uncover, according to corporate attorney Sara Mostafa, writing in a due-diligence framework published by Kiplinger. Missing shareholder consents, unresolved stock issuance problems or outdated board resolutions can all stall a transaction or become leverage buyers use to negotiate a lower price.

Buyers also examine customer and vendor contracts, loan agreements, property leases and any liens against the business. Pending litigation, regulatory issues, product liability claims and other compliance risks should be identified and addressed early, not discovered mid-negotiation. Outstanding liens that should have been cleared need formal termination, and any informal arrangements with related parties should be converted into documented, written agreements before a sale process begins.

Mostafa recommends organising financial statements and tax returns for at least the previous four years, prepared as closely as possible to recognised accounting standards and reviewed or audited by a qualified accountant. Incomplete or inconsistent financial records raise immediate red flags for buyers and can lead to a lower valuation if left uncorrected.

Trademarks, patents, copyrights and trade secrets should be properly documented, along with confidentiality and invention assignment agreements for employees and contractors who work with proprietary information. Businesses should also confirm they meet applicable data privacy requirements, since gaps here increasingly surface during diligence.

On the employment side, businesses should confirm that worker classifications and employment documentation are accurate, and that any pending employment disputes are identified before diligence begins. Founders should also organise information on key customer and vendor relationships, including revenue concentration over the past 12 months, since buyers use this to assess how dependent the business is on a small number of relationships.

ALSO READ: Meet the Managing Partners Behind Nigeria’s Top Audit Firms

Closing the Gaps Before a Buyer Finds Them

Nearly every business turns up gaps once it completes an internal audit of its own records. The difference between a smooth transaction and a difficult one often comes down to whether founders resolve those gaps before the company goes to market.

Buyers are trained to identify risk. When they uncover missing documentation, unresolved compliance issues or operational weaknesses during diligence, those findings frequently become negotiating leverage. What might look like a minor administrative oversight can quickly translate into a lower purchase price, additional indemnification obligations or delays in closing.

Corporate records should be brought up to date well before a sale process starts, whether that means preparing written shareholder or director consents to ratify past corporate actions, or correcting deficiencies in stock issuances. Financial records deserve the same attention: incomplete or inaccurate statements should be reviewed and corrected with the help of a qualified accountant, and intellectual property should be evaluated to confirm trademarks, patents, copyrights or trade secrets carry adequate protection.

Preparing Well Before You Sell

Mostafa advises founders to assemble a team of trusted advisers, including lawyers, accountants and financial advisers, between 12 and 24 months before planning to go to market. This gives enough time to address the gaps a diligence process would otherwise expose, and to position the business favourably before buyers start looking closely.

Beyond a professional advisory team, industry networks and peer groups can provide introductions to potential buyers, capital sources and strategic partners that may not be visible through conventional channels. A stronger top line and a more diversified customer base also make a business more attractive to buyers, since they reduce the concentration risk buyers weigh heavily during diligence.

Key Takeaway 

A profitable business can still lose value at the negotiating table if its records aren’t in order. Clean corporate documentation, resolved legal and compliance issues, consistent financial reporting and an advisory team assembled well in advance are what separate a deal that closes at full value from one that collapses during due diligence.

Leave a Reply