Business - 3 days ago

Dangote: Shipping From Lagos to Accra Costs More Than Spain to Lagos

593

Aliko Dangote recently made a statement that stopped a room. Speaking in conversation with Makhtar Diop, Managing Director of the International Finance Corporation, Africa’s richest industrialist laid out a damning fact about the continent’s trade infrastructure. It costs more to ship goods from Lagos port to Accra than it does to ship them all the way from Spain to Lagos.

The distance from Lagos to Accra is roughly 500 kilometres. The distance from Spain to Lagos spans thousands of kilometres across the Atlantic Ocean. The economics, by any logic, should run in the opposite direction. They do not. And that gap tells a painful story about what is holding Africa back.

The Problem With African Trade

The Lagos-to-Accra anomaly is not an isolated data point. Shipping a standard 20-foot container from Shanghai to Lagos by sea costs approximately $2,500 to $3,000. Comparable intra-African routes often cost significantly more per kilometre, driven by port inefficiencies, border bureaucracy, and a near-total absence of direct regional shipping lines.

Africa lacks a robust network of regional shipping routes. The few that exist face dominance by foreign carriers, who prioritise high-volume global trade routes over short-haul, intra-African trips. Less competition means less pressure on price. Higher prices mean less trade. Less trade means less integration. The cycle feeds itself.

Why Goods Travelling Between African Countries Often Pass Through Europe First

The infrastructure problem runs deeper than shipping rates. It is not uncommon for goods shipped from one African country to another to first pass through Europe or the Middle East before redirection back into Africa. The reason traces directly to colonial history. Africa built its infrastructure to extract resources and export them to Europe, not to promote trade between African nations. Most African railways and ports orient toward external trade. Roads and transport networks move goods from mines and farms to the coast, not across borders to neighbouring countries.

The result is absurd in practical terms. Shipments between Ghana’s Tema Port and Kenya’s Port Mombasa currently take between 55 and 60 days because there is no direct maritime route. Goods travel via European transshipment hubs instead. Ghana’s Export Promotion Authority CEO Francis Kojo Kwarteng called the situation “ridiculous.” Despite being only a six-hour flight apart, the maritime shipping route between Tema and Mombasa takes nearly two months.

What Dangote Said About Borders, Visas, and Broken Integration

Dangote used his IFC conversation to push a broader argument about African integration. He said he needs 38 visas to move across the African continent. At the Africa CEO Forum in Kigali, he told the room: “I have to apply for 35 different visas on my passport.” The audience laughed. It was not funny.

He added that trucks crossing from Lagos into neighbouring Benin can spend a week or more at the border. Short regional flights can be prohibitively expensive. Physical goods, people, and capital all face friction that simply does not exist when dealing with Europe or Asia.

Dangote’s position is unambiguous. “Free movement of people, free movement of goods and services. These are critical areas. Without this, there is no way we are going to have a very prosperous Africa.”

The Confidence Argument: Africans Must Back Africa First

Dangote frames the solution partly as a question of confidence. Africa cannot attract large-scale foreign capital unless Africans demonstrate that they believe in their own markets first.

“We will open Africa by demonstrating that we believe in Africa, by investing our money in Africa,” he said. “If I do not invest my own money, I can never go to any conference and convince people that Africa is a good place to come and invest.”

His own investments carry that argument. The Dangote Refinery in Nigeria cost more than $20 billion and runs in a country that long exported crude oil while importing refined petroleum products. The refinery has tested at 661,000 barrels per day and has held stable at 650,000 barrels per day for two consecutive months. Beyond fuel, the group targets 12 million tons of urea production, develops potash and phosphate mines in Congo-Brazzaville, and pursues a 20,000-megawatt power goal.

The strategy is deliberate. Identify Africa’s critical needs. Build around them. Prove that large-scale industrial projects are viable on African soil.

What AfCFTA Promises and Where It Falls Short

The African Continental Free Trade Area entered its operational phase with significant fanfare. It covers a single market of more than 1.4 billion people. Its architects promised it would reshape intra-African commerce, drive job creation, and reduce poverty across the continent.

As of 2022, intra-African trade accounted for only 17 percent of total African commerce despite the launch of AfCFTA. That number reflects the scale of the gap between political commitment and practical reality.

Experts at a recent Sub-Regional Seminar of the Union of African Shippers’ Councils warned that the region risks losing billions of dollars yearly and may fail to achieve the projected $3 trillion yearly GDP target if it does not implement urgent reforms to boost regional trade. They pointed to long waiting times at ports and borders, overlapping agency procedures, inadequate last-mile infrastructure, and uncoordinated regulations as the core barriers undermining AfCFTA’s promise.

What Has to Change

The shipping cost paradox Dangote describes is a symptom, not a root cause. The root causes are structural: colonial-era port orientation, absent regional shipping infrastructure, excessive border friction, weak enforcement of free trade agreements, and a shortage of African-owned logistics capacity.

Corruption compounds the structural failures. Checkpoints that official orders reduce reappear within two weeks. The real issue is the lack of consequences. Those benefiting from the status quo resist change actively.

Fixing the Lagos-to-Accra shipping premium requires more than political declarations. It requires ports that serve regional trade. It requires borders that process goods in hours, not days. It requires African-owned shipping lines that compete on intra-continental routes. And it requires leaders willing to enforce agreements that powerful interests prefer to ignore.

Dangote’s investments demonstrate that Africa can build at scale. The infrastructure that makes those investments connect to each other is the next chapter.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does it cost more to ship from Lagos to Accra than from Spain to Lagos? The higher cost reflects the near-total absence of direct regional shipping lines between West African ports, heavy reliance on foreign carriers who prioritise global routes over short-haul African ones, poor port infrastructure for intra-regional trade, and excessive border bureaucracy. These factors combine to make short regional trips disproportionately expensive compared to long international voyages.

What did Aliko Dangote say about intra-African shipping costs? Speaking with IFC Managing Director Makhtar Diop, Dangote highlighted that shipping goods from Lagos port to Accra costs more than shipping from Spain to Lagos. He also noted that trucks crossing from Lagos to Benin can spend more than a week at the border, and that he personally needs 38 visas to travel across Africa.

How does intra-African shipping compare to shipping from Asia or Europe? Shipping a standard 20-foot container from Shanghai to Lagos costs approximately $2,500 to $3,000. Intra-African routes frequently cost more per kilometre due to fewer direct connections, transshipment through European hubs, and higher port charges relative to volume.

What is the AfCFTA and why has it not solved the problem? The African Continental Free Trade Area aims to create a single market across 54 African nations. Despite its launch, intra-African trade accounted for just 17 percent of Africa’s total trade as of 2022. Structural barriers including absent direct maritime routes, border delays, overlapping regulations, and foreign carrier dominance continue to undermine the agreement’s potential.