Zimbabwe has officially banned the export of unbeneficiated beryl and feldspar, extending its aggressive resource nationalism strategy to a wider range of critical minerals. The move is designed to compel mining companies to invest in domestic processing facilities rather than shipping raw ores to international markets.
The prohibition was formalised through Statutory Instrument 156 of 2024, issued by the Minister of Mines and Mining Development, Soda Zhemu. The regulation stipulates that no beryl or feldspar shall be exported from Zimbabwe to another country except under a written permit granted by the minister under exceptional circumstances.
This latest regulatory tightening follows the landmark 2022 ban on raw lithium exports, which significantly disrupted the supply chains of artisanal miners and forced large-scale Chinese investors to accelerate the construction of processing plants. The government argues that exporting raw rocks deprives the national economy of potential revenue, jobs, and industrial growth.
Beryl is a mineral composed of beryllium aluminium cyclosilicate, and its high-quality varieties are known as emeralds and aquamarines. However, its industrial value lies in its role as the primary source of beryllium, a lightweight metal used in aerospace, telecommunications, and defence industries. Feldspar is equally vital, serving as a critical component in the manufacturing of glass, ceramics, and high-end paints.
The mining sector is a cornerstone of the Zimbabwean economy, contributing approximately 12 percent to the country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Under President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s administration, the government has set an ambitious target to transform the sector into a $12 billion industry, largely driven by the extraction of gold, platinum group metals (PGMs), and lithium.
Mining Policy Shifts Toward Domestic Value Addition
The decision to include beryl and feldspar in the export ban reflects a broader trend across Africa, where resource-rich nations are increasingly reluctant to act as mere extraction sites for global powers. By restricting raw exports, the Ministry of Mines and Mining Development aims to ensure that the initial stages of the value chain are captured within Zimbabwe’s borders.
Miners who wish to export these minerals must now demonstrate that the ores have undergone sufficient beneficiation or provide proof that local processing is not currently feasible. The government has previously stated that it intends to move away from a “dig and ship” model, which it blames for the country’s persistent trade deficits and lack of industrial depth.
The 2022 ban on raw lithium serves as a template for this current move. Following that restriction, several Chinese firms, including Huayou Cobalt and Sinomine Resource Group, invested hundreds of millions of dollars into lithium concentrator plants. As reported by Reuters at the time, the lithium ban was a response to massive smuggling operations and the loss of billions in potential tax revenue.
However, the transition to local processing is not without challenges. Small-scale and artisanal miners, who often lack the capital to invest in expensive machinery, are the most vulnerable to these policy shifts. While large corporations can absorb the costs of building concentrators, smaller players often find themselves with stockpiles of ore they can no longer legally sell to foreign buyers.
Market analysts suggest that the ban on beryl and feldspar may lead to a short-term dip in export volumes as the industry adjusts to the new requirements. There is also the risk that without immediate domestic buyers or processing infrastructure, the ban could inadvertently fuel illegal cross-border trade if enforcement is not rigorous.
Despite these risks, the government remains committed to its long-term vision. The $12 billion mining economy target relies heavily on the success of these value-addition policies. If Zimbabwe can successfully transition from an ore exporter to a processed mineral supplier, it could significantly improve its foreign currency earnings and create a more resilient industrial base.
The Ministry of Mines has indicated that it will monitor compliance closely. All existing export permits for raw beryl and feldspar are expected to be reviewed, and new applications will face stringent scrutiny. This move signals to international investors that access to Zimbabwe’s mineral wealth will increasingly be tied to commitments for local investment and infrastructure development.
For the global market, this policy change adds another layer of complexity to the procurement of critical minerals. As more African nations adopt similar stances, the cost of raw materials for high-tech industries in Europe and Asia may rise, potentially shifting the geographic focus of global mineral processing hubs closer to the points of extraction.
Explore more Business stories and analysis from Business Elites Africa.
