Uber has abruptly withdrawn its operations from the Nigerian market, triggering a sharp backlash from the Amalgamated Union of App-Based Transporters of Nigeria (AUATON).
The exit, which was communicated without prior notice to many of its partners, has left thousands of drivers facing an immediate loss of income and operational stability.
In a statement reported by BusinessDay, AUATON condemned the move, describing the withdrawal as a betrayal of the workers who helped establish and scale the company’s footprint across major Nigerian cities.
The union expressed outrage over the manner of the exit, arguing that the company failed to provide a transition period or a comprehensive exit strategy for the drivers who relied on the platform for their primary livelihood.
The sudden disappearance of the platform is expected to disrupt urban mobility in hubs such as Lagos and Abuja, where Uber had long been a dominant player in the ride-hailing sector.
AUATON representatives argued that the abruptness of the decision demonstrates a lack of corporate social responsibility and a disregard for the labour conditions of gig workers in emerging markets.
The union is now calling for a formal explanation from the company regarding the motives behind the withdrawal and demanding compensation for drivers who may have taken loans to acquire vehicles specifically for the platform.
Macroeconomic Pressures and the Tech Exodus
The exit of Uber comes amid a broader trend of global technology firms scaling back or completely withdrawing from the Nigerian market. Many of these companies have cited the extreme volatility of the Naira and the difficulty of repatriating funds as primary drivers for their departure.
The persistent devaluation of the local currency has eroded the profit margins of dollar-denominated businesses, making the cost of maintaining local operations unsustainable for some global entities.
This move mirrors previous exits by other foreign tech startups and services that found the macroeconomic environment in Nigeria too volatile to support long-term growth targets.
Industry analysts suggest that the high cost of operating in Nigeria, combined with regulatory hurdles and fluctuating inflation rates, has made the country a risky environment for foreign venture-backed firms.
The withdrawal also exposes the vulnerability of the gig economy in Nigeria, where workers often operate without formal employment contracts, health insurance, or pension schemes.
With the exit of one of the two largest players, the market is expected to see a temporary surge in demand for remaining services provided by competitors such as Bolt and InDrive.
However, there are concerns that the remaining platforms may increase their commission rates or change their terms of service as they absorb the displaced driver pool and increased passenger volume.
The Federal Ministry of Transportation has not yet issued an official response to the exit, but the development is likely to prompt renewed calls for stronger regulations governing digital platforms to protect local workers.
Transport advocates are urging the government to create a regulatory framework that prevents foreign digital firms from exiting markets without adhering to minimum labour standards or providing notice periods.
The immediate priority for AUATON is to ensure that drivers are not left with stranded debts and to explore alternative partnerships that can sustain the livelihoods of the affected transporters.
The union has indicated that it will seek legal advice to determine if the abrupt exit violates any local labour laws or contractual agreements between the platform and its registered partners.
The outcome of these legal inquiries and any potential government intervention will determine the next phase of the ride-hailing landscape in Nigeria.
Explore more Companies stories and analysis from Business Elites Africa.
